Various payment innovations have been testing ways to support primary care innovation and PCMH for many years. Depending on the region and the provider arrangement (e.g., a solo or small practice, an Independent Practice Association or Accountable Care Organization (ACO), or an employed provider as part of a health system), some practices that were once paid fee-for-service only, are now receiving additional per member per month payments (PMPM). Others are receiving payment incentives tied to performance metrics that measure quality, cost, or patient engagement. Medicare has been piloting various types of payment reform — ranging from pay-for-reporting to bundled payment — but the scale and spread of delivery models that tie payment to quality for all Medicare benefi ciaries is more recent.
As part of the Affordable Care Act, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation (CMMI) is spearheading one of the most aggressive efforts in recent history to address delivery system reform. Recent passage of MACRA can help bring these efforts to scale across the entire Medicare program, and subsequently impact the broader commercial marketplace.
Because fee-for-service does not reimburse for key PCMH features — such as facilitating information sharing and care coordination with sub-specialists and hospitals, managing web-portals and personal health records, email communication and telephone visits, developing connections to community-based organizations, and integrating behavioral health — it often fails to compensate for the complete scope of services offered by a PCMH. Smaller practices with little reserve capacity are especially challenged in offering PCMH-level care without adequate financial support.
Numerous alternative payment models (APMs) are poised to support PCMH implementation and sustainability. Significant experimentation and testing of alternative payment arrangements is well underway, ranging from accountable care, to episode-based payment initiatives, to up-front payments that support primary care practice transformation, to initiatives that focus on specific populations, such as Medicaid, CHIP, or individuals dually eligible for Medicaid and Medicare.
For more information, please access our 2014-2015 PCMH evidence report.
Title | Source | Date |
---|---|---|
States make progress with medical homes | Healthcare Payer News | June 4, 2012 |
States move ahead with Medicaid medical homes | Government Health IT News | June 4, 2012 |
Studies offer close-up look at medical home model | Modern Healthcare | February 26, 2014 |
Study Demonstrates Value of Practice Supports During PCMH Transition Process | AAFP News | April 24, 2013 |
Study: Blue Cross avoided $155 million in costs in medical home project | Modern Healthcare | August 11, 2013 |
Summit Focuses on Lower Health Care Costs, Success of New Models | AAFP News | June 17, 2013 |
Supreme Court Battle Brewing Over Medicaid Fees | Kaiser Health News | January 12, 2015 |
Survey: 1 in 3 Family Physicians Pursuing Value-based Payment | AAFP News | December 2, 2015 |
Take value-based care beyond just financial rewards | FierceHealthPayer | July 16, 2014 |
The Addiction Recovery Medical Home As An Alternative Payment Model | Health Affairs Blog | December 12, 2018 |